Saturday, 7 February 2026

Is Willowbrook Park a Sustainable Urban Development?

 In 2025 I undertook the course Sustainable Cities: An Introduction taught by my fantastic and friendly colleague Dr David Howard. I wanted to share an updated version of the assignment from the course online in case anyone found it interesting.

Is Willowbrook Park a Sustainable Urban Development? 

Introduction

This essay reviews the sustainability of one of the ongoing green-field developments to the North-East of Didcot. Willowbrook park is one part of a major development of around 2,000 homes to the North of Didcot, being delivered by Croudace homes, alongside two other developers. Willowbrook Park was begun before the other developments and is nearly complete, with most sections built and inhabited. The wider development is part of a major extension of Didcot as part of the Didcot garden town masterplan (South Oxfordshire Council, 2017).

The developer claims that “Ecological and environmental aspects of construction are of the utmost importance” (Croudace homes, 2025a: 4). To assess this claim, I will first give an overview of the development in question and its context, provide a working definition of sustainability and then discuss how well the development fares according to the three pillars of sustainability. I will focus mostly on the environmental pillar.

Context

The extension of Didcot takes place in order to meet the acute housing need in Oxfordshire arising due to economic success and rapid population growth. South Oxfordshire has been the focus of a lot of job and housing growth, particularly arising due to research developments at Harwell, Culham and Oxford. As there are green belt restrictions around Oxford, Didcot has been the focus of housing growth due to its location.

Figure 1 Map with Didcot, Railway lines and Location of development marked with an X.

Didcot grew into a town as it is the junction station where the Oxford branch line deviated from the Great Western Railway Mainline (London to Bristol). The Oxford branch was soon connected to the North to allow North-South journeys. As a result, Didcot is a major passenger transportation hub with trains and buses. It is also a logistics hub, with the A34 North-South trunk Road complementing the rail connection.

Sustainability

What does it mean to say that a development is sustainable? This term can be used in many ways and so it is appropriate to ensure that the word is being applied in a meaningful and helpful way. Care should be taken because there are ongoing concerns about the potential for greenwashing by profit-seeking firms, who would get some value from being perceived to be sustainable.

A development exists within a wider context, of course. This complicates the picture because it is the wider context that often matters, and each development cannot change that all on its own. However, a development can make a positive (or negative) contribution to the overall sustainability of a community, region, country, and world.

An early and influential definition was needs-focused, “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Brundtland 1987). An appealing later definition was that “there is some X whose value should be maintained, in as far as it lies within our power to do so, into the indefinite future” (Barry 1997, 101). This leaves it open what the X should be. Human capabilities are a useful metric for some purposes, and Helm argues that capabilities are what should be provided to future generations (Sen 1980; Helm 2023).

For the purposes of this essay, I propose that the urban environment should… “provide the capability of living well to the present and future generations, while contributing positively to the ability of the wider world to also achieve those aims.” Sustainable developments are those which help a city achieve these aims to a greater extent.

To make the task more manageable I will organise my discussion around the three pillars (Purvis, Mao, and Robinson 2019). I will focus mostly on the Environmental pillar even though there is no implied order or priority between them.

One approach which is positive for sustainability on all three pillars is to achieve a “fifteen-minute city.” This means that all major amenities can be found within a 15 minute walk (Moreno 2024). The development achieves this for some amenities (primary school, convenience store [when opened]), but certainly not all, meaning that many people will drive.

Social Pillar

In terms of social sustainability, as a green field development a new community will need to be formed. Some features should help with placemaking. At the Southern entrance to the development there is a square “neighbourhood park” which also serves as flood abatement infrastructure. A community centre is being built nearby with a public square outside which faces across to a primary school. This should offer a good meeting place (Whyte 1988). Hopefully the future community will find ways to use these flexible and accessible spaces according to their needs and wants (Ellery and Ellery 2019).

Another point that should encourage placemaking is that a lot of the buildings have balconies and are close to the street. This means that residents will be close to passing neighbours, increasing the likelihood of social engagement.

Economic pillar

The strong relatively South Oxfordshire economy is the underlying reason for the development, by attracting new workers to the area. South Oxfordshire benefits from many research and science enterprises in the “Science vale,” particularly those based at Harwell and Culham, employment sites at Milton Park. Didcot is also a dormitory commuter town for major employment centres of Oxford, Reading and London. The development should be economically sustainable to the extent that it relates to these local opportunities. However, the development is not within walking or wheeling distance of very many employment sites.

Many opportunity sites are reachable by car or bike and/or public transport. Two bus routes run through the site and towards employment sites. Didcot railway station can be reached relatively quickly by bicycle. From here trains and buses run to many major urban centres and employment sites.

Environmental

Nature and the built environment

The masterplan for the development retained existing field boundaries, hedgerows, ditches and many trees (See figures 2, 3 and 4). This will help the development to maintain and allow the continuation of local natural processes, ecosystems, species and biodiversity.

A road with grass and trees

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 2: A retained field boundary with trees and shrubs.

Blue-grey development

The development is on flat land which was previously considered unsuitable for development due to its position at the foot of the local elevated land and little above the level of the nearby River Thames. Flood mitigation measures were therefore important, particularly since Climate change is expected to increase the intensity of rainfall in the future and therefore increase the likelihood of flooding (Kendon et al. 2025).

Care was seemingly taken to ensure that the hydrological measures would allow the urban and natural to co-exist to some degree. In figure 3 below we see that existing oak trees and a stream with reeds were retained at a lower level of elevation than the newly built roads, paths and housing.

 


Figure 3: natural features and flood mitigation.

Figure 4 features an impound pond at an elevation between that of the housing and the ditch/stream below. The trees and hedges alongside the ditch have been retained, and these form the boundary of the neighbourhood park mentioned above. This is an example of blue-grey-green development, where hydrological structures are built in such a way as to work alongside natural processes (Depietri and McPhearson 2017).

Wildlife [or ecological] corridors are an important feature of a sustainable city, as these provide sanctuary for species and a means to pass safely between different areas without being exposed to predators and vehicles. The continuation of existing hedgerows and ditches, may help provide wildlife corridors in the future. However, mesh fences may serve as a barrier to this. Open fences such as the ones in photo 3 should be less of a barrier.

 

A road with a fence and houses in the background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 4: flood mitigation impound pond alongside a ditch with trees and grass surrounding.

A street with buildings and cars

Figure 5: View from the neighbourhood park to a dense housing development

Housing sustainability

The developer makes strong claims about their sustainability record, with webpages, brochures and a sustainability framework (Croudace Homes 2025b). From my perspective they do appear to take sustainability much more seriously than their rival housing developers, though that may be to compare them against a low bar. The density of the development is high in some areas, as depicted in Figures 5 and 6, but low in others. I will give my impression having walked around the area.

A major source of greenhouse emissions and pollution comes from the energy used for heating and transport. All the housing appears to offer a parking space with an EV charger. This provides for a future in which cars are electric and thus much less polluting and expensive to run, which is preferable to combustion vehicles. This is increasingly the case as the GB electricity supply continues its rapid decarbonisation (NESO, 2025), with a government target for over 95% clean electricity by 2030 (DESNZ, 2025). On the other hand, vehicles are environmentally damaging to produce and get relatively little use compared to commercial or shared/hire vehicles, and so a more sustainable city is one in which cars are not necessary because everything is within easy walking and cycling distance.

Buildings often have solar panels, though the early houses in the development had one or two on highly suitable south-facing rooves that could have held many more. Subsequent buildings have more, though roof space is still not fully optimised for solar generation. This makes the installations appear as examples of box-ticking for regulation purposes and represent a missed opportunity for clean electricity generation.

In terms of heating, figure 6 contains some examples of heat pump usage. This is by far the most sustainable form of heating as it can run from zero carbon renewable electricity and operates at a positive efficiency level of up to 500% by absorbing heat from environment. However, these examples are sadly rare, as gas heating seems much more common. [Update: One large house appears to have had a large Octopus Energy installation recently, presumably of an Air Source Heat Pump, which may have received a government grant for £7,500 to remove a heating system that was virtually brand new. This points to the economic as well as environmental unsustainability of installing gas infrastructure that will need to be removed and replaced at great expense]. Housing heat efficiency regulatory standards have increased over time, and while the developer may be meeting and possibly exceeding these, they are not seemingly aiming for Passivhaus thermal efficiency standards.

A row of brick buildings with cars parked in front of them

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 6: Dense housing with heat pumps and EV charging

Conclusion

Overall, there are many features of the development which are positive in terms of sustainability. Some may have been driven by regulation or the site masterplan, though the developer appears to take sustainability more seriously than rival firms. That said, the development is not a 15 minute city and there are areas in which opportunities have been missed.

References

Online resources

Croudace homes, (2025a) Willowbrook Park Brochure url: https://www.croudace.co.uk/SiteFiles/905/Didcot%20overview%20brochure.pdf downloaded on 01/12/2025

Croudace homes, (2025b) “Sustainability” on website url: https://www.croudacehomes.co.uk/Sustainability [viewed on 12/12/2025]

DESNZ [Department for Energy Security & Net Zero] (2025) Policy paper Clean Power 2030 Action Plan: A new era of clean electricity url: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/clean-power-2030-action-plan/clean-power-2030-action-plan-a-new-era-of-clean-electricity-main-report

NESO [National Energy System Operator] (2025), “Carbon Intensity dashboard” url:  https://dashboard.neso.energy/  

South Oxfordshire Council (2017) Didcot Garden Plan Delivery Plan https://www.southoxon.gov.uk/south-oxfordshire-district-council/business-and-economy/garden-communities/didcot-garden-town/didcot-garden-town-delivery-plan/ Downloaded on 11/12/2025

Whyte, W.H. (1988) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Municipal Art Society. Available at: https://archive.org/details/CitySpacesHumanPlacesLinks to an external site.

 

Published resources

Barry, Brian. 1997. "Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice." Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory (89): 43-64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41802067.

Brundtland, Gro Harlem. 1987. "Our common future world commission on environment and developement."

Depietri, Yaella, and Timon McPhearson. 2017. "Integrating the grey, green, and blue in cities: nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation and risk reduction." In Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas: Linkages between science, policy and practice, 91-109. Springer International Publishing Cham.

Ellery, Peter J., and Jane Ellery. 2019. "Strengthening Community Sense of Place through Placemaking." Urban Planning; Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Public Space in the New Urban Agenda: Research into ImplementationDO - 10.17645/up.v4i2.2004. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2004.

Helm, Dieter. 2023. Legacy: How to build the sustainable economy. Cambridge University Press.

Kendon, Mike, Amy Doherty, Dan Hollis, Emily Carlisle, Stephen Packman, Svetlana Jevrejeva, Andrew Matthews, Joanne Williams, Judith Garforth, and Tim Sparks. 2025. "State of the UK Climate in 2024." International Journal of Climatology 45 (S1): e70010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70010. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70010.

Moreno, Carlos. 2024. The 15-Minute city: a solution to saving our time and our planet. John Wiley & Sons.

Purvis, Ben, Yong Mao, and Darren Robinson. 2019. "Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins." Sustainability science 14 (3): 681-695.

Sen, Amartya. 1980. "Equality of What?" In The Tanner Lectures On Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Sunday, 28 December 2025

Can economic growth be sustainable? Course and resources

I have recently released this You Tube video inspired by my upcoming online course Economics on a Finite Planet: Sustainability, Growth and Degrowth.  


The questions are along the lines of  How should we measure economic progress? What should economic policy aim at? Can Capitalism ever be sustainable? Is it time for degrowth? 

I wanted to share some other materials that would be useful for those planning to take the course, or just who are interested in the topic. 

Online Videos




An introduction to economics:

Doughnut economics explainers: 



This debate between Jason Hickel and Sam Fankhauser is highly relevant...



The Economist Dieter Helm has made two lecture series available on his website:

Online books, reports and articles 

Dasgupta, Partha. The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review. (HM Treasury, 2021)

Hickel, J. and Kallis, G., 2020. Is green growth possible?New political economy25(4), pp.469-486.

Stern, Nicholas. Stern Review: The economics of climate change (UK Govt. 2006).

Podcasts

The most relevant podcast that I have found is "Economics for Rebels" which has many episodes. 

Thinkers from the course readings such as Jason Hickel, Diane Coyle, Kate Raworth, Tim Jackson, Dieter Helm and Daniel Susskind have appeared on several podcast episodes each. 

Something’s Got to Give [Dieter Helm and Diane Coyle] Past, Present, Future podcast (2023)

Other recommendations? 

If you want to recommend any resources on this topic do share them in the comments below! 


Tuesday, 19 August 2025

Useful Free Online Taxation explainers

Here are a list of materials on taxation that I share with my Political Economy of Taxation students as a primer to the subject.

Firstly, here is a video that I made to advertise the course: Why does tax policy matter?

I have also made a video discussing wealth taxes.  



Online lectures/videos/podcasts

Here are some lectures and videos:

Helen Miller “Where does the government get money from?Princeton Economics (2021)

James Hannam “Improving the public conversation about tax" Tax Research Network (2020)

Michael Keen and Joel Slemrod “Book Talk: Rebellion, Rascals, and Revenue: Tax Follies and Wisdom through the Ages"

Podcasts (also available as videos)

When and how to raise taxesIFS Zooms In (2021)

"Dan Neidle: Why Wealth Taxes Will Backfire Spectacularly" Institute of Economic Affairs (2025)

If you are interested in learning about this topic it would be great to have you on my course!

Wednesday, 14 May 2025

New video on wind power

 

I've put together a short video about the prospects for wind power in the UK.

It is only five minutes long. 


I didn't give the context but wind power provides up to 60% of UK electricity at present and new wind farms are being constructed all the time.
 The amount provided varies depending on supply (i.e. windiness) and demand. 

Indeed, the problem now is that when it is windy the wind farms have to be disconnected from the grid because there aren't enough connections between the areas with the wind generation (Scotland in particular) and the rest of the country. 

In the future, when wind is capable of powering the whole country the price of electricity will probably drop to zero. This is because there is no need for any fuel to run the wind turbines. 

The UK no longer uses coal to generate electricity, since it is so much more polluting than gas. 

All the wind, solar and batteries that we add to our grid in the UK means less purchase and burning of methane gas. 

Thursday, 27 February 2025

How should I rename the CLIPH-rate tax

 A while back I developed and presented my tax proposal. 

Initially I called it the CIPH-rate tax. 

Then I added an L and made it the CLIPH-rate tax. 

That stands for Comprehensive Lifetime Income per hour.

The name is accurate but the invocation of a cliff is a very bad idea. Cliffs are dangerous things that people fall off and die.  

It is also extremely misleading - my proposal if is for a smooth tax-rate curve rather than the familiar thresholds with sharp changes in rate at those income points. 

Tax to reward work

I have been following with interest the enthusiasm among those on the US right for the "No Tax on Overtime" proposal. 

This is driven by a similar ideal to the one that drives the CLIPH-rate tax. 

People who work longer hours should pay lower rates of tax than someone who earns the same amount in less time. 

An overtime tax is a blunt instrument to do that, but it is interesting to see the enthusiasm for it. 

What would be a better name?

So, what snappy name can we come up with for my proposal that makes it sound less technical and avoid invoking the idea of a cliff?

Here are some initial ideas:  

  • Work reward system
  • Laziness tax 

There are downsides to the latter term, because it might end up punishing those unable to work for health reasons, which is certainly not my aim. Those unable to work should be much better off than they are at present. 

But those who are able to work and who do not do so should pay much higher rates of tax. I'm thinking here of those who live off inherited and other unearned wealth, rather than working for a living. 

Does anyone have any alternative name suggestions? 

A better way to map political views?

 I have found political debate frustrating for many reasons lately.

There are various ways to label political views, but I found them all too limited. Left and right is too simplistic. The political compass is better but still gives strange results and oversimplifies.

There are useful value axes surveys, such as 8values and 9axes. These are helpful to people in working out their own values, but not really in terms of giving them a label or relating them to others.

I’ve therefore had a go at developing an alternative political compass.

I thought the easiest way to explain it was to put it in a video, so that is what I did:

The basic idea is that there are certain points of appeal for people and it is a question of which one they value most. Some are strongly opposed to one another, hence the ‘magnetic poles’ or ‘gravity’ metaphors. Other poles are friendly to one another.

My three spectrums of opposition (free market versusstate economy, hierarchical versus anti-hierarchical, authoritarian versus decentralised) with liberal individualist pluralism in the middle.

Thoughts and suggestions are very welcome!

Friday, 3 January 2025

How should you think about EV Range?

Historically, "Range anxiety" has been a major barrier to Battery Electric Vehicle (EV) adoption. Early Nissan Leafs (Leaves?) only had about 100 miles of range after all. 


However, as battery costs have dropped more recent cars have larger batteries, meaning that even budget EVs now do around 200 miles. 

Range Anxiety vs. Charger Anxiety

Rapid charging speeds have increased as well, meaning that a charging stop doesn't mean hours of waiting but rather a brief stop of around 20-30 minutes to get you on your way. 

This reduces concern about range, since running out doesn't mean waiting for 6 hours to refill as it did with EVs made before about 2015. 

People choosing an EV should look at its maximum charging speed as well as range. There are some extra complicating factors here, but generally the higher the maximum speed the quicker the DC rapid charge. 

If you can do a rapid top-up to get to your final destination why worry about range? 

As range has increased and EV sales have outpaced new infrastructure, EV drivers are much more likely to have "charger anxiety" than range anxiety. 

This is the concern that chargers will be broken or occupied when you arrive in desperate need of a charge. 

The infrastructure will continue to improve with the sales of EVs, though sadly the two might not always be perfectly in-step and the power network requires a lot of upgrades as part of the energy transition. 

How to think about range?

Despite this, range is still a considering when looking to buy an EV. 

Electricity is much cheaper at home and rapid chargers in the UK are very expensive (up to 10x the cost of charging at home). A bigger range means less need to charge away from home. 

Furthermore, range will mean more options when it comes to where to charge. It offers more flexibility. 

However, range is rarely an issue for most people's lives. Most people drive to work and back, perhaps occasionally stopping off at a shop or something as well. 

As long as the range is sufficient to get back home on one charge and then refill the battery for the next day what difference does it make? 

Range becomes a factor for those who go on long distance journeys of several hundreds of miles, for instance to see relatives for celebrations. 

Real world range

This is where knowledge of EV batteries becomes useful. 

People who complain about EV range usually feel aggrieved because their car was advertised as getting, say 250miles range but they only got 185 before it ran out. They've been scammed! 

In fact, they have not been scammed. They just weren't informed (perhaps a salesperson actively misled them but the information would be out there). 

EV range is not a fixed amount but rather one that varies depending on several factors. 

Here is real range of the 'long range' version of the MG4 (there is now an extended range with an even bigger battery).  

This comes from the excellent resource that is the EV Database website. Do check this database before buying an EV. 

You can immediately see that the range can be twice as much pootling around the city in the summer compared to doing a highway drive at 70mph on a particularly cold Winter's day. 

An ICE car will also get different range depending on driving conditions but no one really thinks about it much. They are so inefficient (due to waste heat) that a little bit extra inefficiency hardly makes any difference. And they waste so much heat that they don't suffer so much from cold once they get going. 

The equation for range is a simple one. How much energy is stored in the battery and how efficient is the car at converting the energy into miles. 

The larger the battery and the higher the efficiency the longer the range. 

Efficiency varies depending on speed (above 60mph efficiency really drops off) and low temperature also reduces efficiency because some power needs to go into keeping everything suitably warm. 

So it isn't just battery size that determines range. 

Aerodynamics matters too (low and long saloon cars being more efficient than massive slab SUVs). Weight is very important of course. Heat pumps will also help with efficiency when it is very cold as well because they take less energy to achieve the desired temperature.  

The most efficient EVs include:

Long slippery saloons:
  • Tesla Model 3 
  • Hyundai IONIQ 6 
Smaller, lighter cars: 
  • Mini Cooper 
  • Corsa Electric 
  • Skoda Citigo (and identical cars) 

Essentially these are well-designed cars that are aerodynamic and keep weight limited. 

The least efficient EVs include:

Big bois: 
  • Mercedes-Benz G 580 (over 3 metric tonnes!)
  • Volkswagen ID. Buzz (basically a van)
Sporty flashers:
  • Audi e-tron S
  • Lotus Eletre R

Essentially these are cars that emphasise either size or speed and have no regard for efficiency. 

The efficient cars above (the best) are twice as efficient as the ones below (the worst). 

What range do you need? 

We got the Standard Range version of the MG4 (51kWh) because it is perfectly adequate for us. We can visit our immediately family and return on one charge without any issue. 

We may take one holiday driving trip per year which goes beyond that range and it is no problem to charge on such journeys. 

A car with a battery size of 45-55kWh will be fine for most people, and most budget cars will be around this size going forwards. 

However, some people might have long commutes, regular long journeys or family who live further away. For them a longer range vehicle may make more sense (60-100kWh). 

The downside of a bigger battery is that it is more weight for the car to carry, which reduces efficiency and therefore range. 

Conclusions?

The right car depends on numerous factors, such as lifestyle and various preference (including aesthetic). There is no single "right" answer. This is why car companies produce numerous models and variations. 

Many people can now ignore the issue of range for a new EV. The range of a standard model will be adequate and charging speeds are sufficient to cover the occasional longer journey. 

However, those who need a longer range car (regularly making longer journeys) then the following considerations are more important because they will impact upon range:

  • Battery size 
  • Total weight of vehicle
  • Efficiency of equipment (possibly including a heat pump if driving long distances in winter)
  • Aerodynamics (shape)