Hour credits are highly valuable in an hourly averaging
economy. Their distribution would need to be tightly controlled and the rules
for entitlement to them would need to be strictly applied. The binary nature of
hour credits could be seen as a source of great inflexibility in the system. In
some cases the choice to give out hour credits for certain activities could be
a very difficult one. Disallowing hour credits for an activity might stifle a
highly useful and important part of the economy or society. Allowing them, on
the other hand, may have serious consequences.
Consider the example of hour credits for writers. If writers
are not able to claim hour credits this would reduce writing to a hobby
activity, one which would need to be funded largely by people working on other
activities. Great writers might have to waste valuable writing time doing
approved work and society would miss out on many if not all of their latent
works. Now consider the other extreme, where writers are given hour credits for
spending time writing. If anyone is able to declare that they are writing
something then many more people would than the number who would be considered
serious writers. Free-riders could occasionally hand in a load of nonsense to
justify the valuable hour credits (and the money that follows) they receive
from society. Plus we wouldn’t want government approved censors making the call
about which works were artistically valuable. The two extremes are undesirable.
My proposal is that people should be able to register
‘potential hour credits’ for some activities, for example that of unfunded
writing explained above. These potential hour credits would not generate any
tax or income benefits when they are granted. If the activities later generate
income then the authorities can upgrade these potential hour credits into fully
fledged ones. This could be applied at a rate of converting one hour credit for
an amount earned above the zero-tax point. So if this amount is set at twice
the zero-tax point and this point is £9 per hour then the potential hour credit
upgrade rate would be one hour credit for every £18 earned from the activity.
Once the income from the activity exceeds the number of potential hour credits
there are no more to convert. Of course the taxpayer can continue to receive
further income but this will have no further effect on hour credits.
A further suggestion (from my very clever fiancée Katy) is
that the upgrade of potential hour credits could be accompanied by a tax-free
top up payment as well. This would represent the difference in the value of an
hour credit of the required value being received at the time the potential hour
credit was granted and the time at which the potential hour credit was
upgraded. Katy suggested using the ‘social time and preference rate.’ For the
most part the payment would be very small. However, where the rate is high or
the time-span is long the payment could be valuable to the recipient.
This briefly explains potential hour credits. Let me know in
the comments if anything is left unclear. In the following posts I will explain
the sorts of activities that would qualify, and also present another possible
use for potential hour credits for self-employed workers.
No comments:
Post a Comment